[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZRQq3EbibSWcKnTp6+iFJACeaytQEX+zR69Y_4LMSkYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 23:07:29 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Tomlinson <Mark.Tomlinson@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"ray.jui@...adcom.com" <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"sbranden@...adcom.com" <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"rjui@...adcom.com" <rjui@...adcom.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: initialise nsp-mux earlier.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:44 AM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> On 6/30/2020 9:37 PM, Mark Tomlinson wrote:
> > That was one of my thoughts too. I found someone had tried that
> > earlier, but it was rejected:
> >
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-gpio/patch/1516566774-1786-1-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com/
>
> clk or reset APIs do not complain loudly on EPROBE_DEFER, it seems to me
> that GPIO should follow here. Also, it does look like Linus was in
> agreement in the end, not sure why it was not applied though.
I never got an updated patch. My last message was:
>> so you mean something like this?
>>
>> if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> dev_info(dev, "deferring probe\n")
>> else
>> dev_err(dev, "... failed to register\n")
>
> Yes exactly.
Patches welcome :D
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists