[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c62fc116-b3e0-c47c-5606-df62b1d10a04@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 20:13:13 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>, drinkcat@...omium.org,
hsinyi@...omium.org, Michael Kao <michael.kao@...iatek.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "thermal: mediatek: fix register index error"
On 12/07/2020 18:55, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On 10/07/2020 15:58, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/07/2020 12:34, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>>> This reverts commit eb9aecd90d1a39601e91cd08b90d5fee51d321a6
>>>
>>> The above patch is supposed to fix a register index error on mt2701. It
>>> is not clear if the problem solved is a hang or just an invalid value
>>> returned, my guess is the second. The patch introduces, though, a new
>>> hang on MT8173 device making them unusable. So, seems reasonable, revert
>>> the patch because introduces a worst issue.
>>>
>>> The reason I send a revert instead of trying to fix the issue for MT8173
>>> is because the information needed to fix the issue is in the datasheet
>>> and is not public. So I am not really able to fix it.
>>>
>>> Fixes the following bug when CONFIG_MTK_THERMAL is set on MT8173
>>> devices.
>>>
>>> [ 2.222488] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
>>> address ffff8000125f5001
>>> [ 2.230421] Mem abort info:
>>> [ 2.233207] ESR = 0x96000021
>>> [ 2.236261] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
>>> [ 2.241571] SET = 0, FnV = 0
>>> [ 2.244623] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
>>> [ 2.247762] Data abort info:
>>> [ 2.250640] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000021
>>> [ 2.254473] CM = 0, WnR = 0
>>> [ 2.257544] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs,
>>> pgdp=0000000041850000
>>> [ 2.264251] [ffff8000125f5001] pgd=000000013ffff003,
>>> pud=000000013fffe003, pmd=000000013fff9003, pte=006800001100b707
>>> [ 2.274867] Internal error: Oops: 96000021 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>> [ 2.280432] Modules linked in:
>>> [ 2.283483] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc6+ #162
>>> [ 2.289914] Hardware name: Google Elm (DT)
>>> [ 2.294003] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO)
>>> [ 2.298792] pc : mtk_read_temp+0xb8/0x1c8
>>> [ 2.302793] lr : mtk_read_temp+0x7c/0x1c8
>>> [ 2.306794] sp : ffff80001003b930
>>> [ 2.310100] x29: ffff80001003b930 x28: 0000000000000000
>>> [ 2.315404] x27: 0000000000000002 x26: ffff0000f9550b10
>>> [ 2.320709] x25: ffff0000f9550a80 x24: 0000000000000090
>>> [ 2.326014] x23: ffff80001003ba24 x22: 00000000610344c0
>>> [ 2.331318] x21: 0000000000002710 x20: 00000000000001f4
>>> [ 2.336622] x19: 0000000000030d40 x18: ffff800011742ec0
>>> [ 2.341926] x17: 0000000000000001 x16: 0000000000000001
>>> [ 2.347230] x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: ffffff0000000000
>>> [ 2.352535] x13: ffffffffffffffff x12: 0000000000000028
>>> [ 2.357839] x11: 0000000000000003 x10: ffff800011295ec8
>>> [ 2.363143] x9 : 000000000000291b x8 : 0000000000000002
>>> [ 2.368447] x7 : 00000000000000a8 x6 : 0000000000000004
>>> [ 2.373751] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff800011295cb0
>>> [ 2.379055] x3 : 0000000000000002 x2 : ffff8000125f5001
>>> [ 2.384359] x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : ffff0000f9550a80
>>> [ 2.389665] Call trace:
>>> [ 2.392105] mtk_read_temp+0xb8/0x1c8
>>> [ 2.395760] of_thermal_get_temp+0x2c/0x40
>>> [ 2.399849] thermal_zone_get_temp+0x78/0x160
>>> [ 2.404198] thermal_zone_device_update.part.0+0x3c/0x1f8
>>> [ 2.409589] thermal_zone_device_update+0x34/0x48
>>> [ 2.414286] of_thermal_set_mode+0x58/0x88
>>> [ 2.418375] thermal_zone_of_sensor_register+0x1a8/0x1d8
>>> [ 2.423679] devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register+0x64/0xb0
>>> [ 2.429242] mtk_thermal_probe+0x690/0x7d0
>>> [ 2.433333] platform_drv_probe+0x5c/0xb0
>>> [ 2.437335] really_probe+0xe4/0x448
>>> [ 2.440901] driver_probe_device+0xe8/0x140
>>> [ 2.445077] device_driver_attach+0x7c/0x88
>>> [ 2.449252] __driver_attach+0xac/0x178
>>> [ 2.453082] bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc8
>>> [ 2.456909] driver_attach+0x2c/0x38
>>> [ 2.460476] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x230
>>> [ 2.464304] driver_register+0x6c/0x128
>>> [ 2.468131] __platform_driver_register+0x50/0x60
>>> [ 2.472831] mtk_thermal_driver_init+0x24/0x30
>>> [ 2.477268] do_one_initcall+0x50/0x298
>>> [ 2.481098] kernel_init_freeable+0x1ec/0x264
>>> [ 2.485450] kernel_init+0x1c/0x110
>>> [ 2.488931] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
>>> [ 2.492502] Code: f9401081 f9400402 b8a67821 8b010042 (b9400042)
>>> [ 2.498599] ---[ end trace e43e3105ed27dc99 ]---
>>> [ 2.503367] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
>>> exitcode=0x0000000b
>>> [ 2.511020] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>>> [ 2.514941] Kernel Offset: disabled
>>> [ 2.518421] CPU features: 0x090002,25006005
>>> [ 2.522595] Memory Limit: none
>>> [ 2.525644] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill
>>> init! exitcode=0x0000000b ]--
>>>
>>> Cc: Michael Kao <michael.kao@...iatek.com>
>>> Fixes: eb9aecd90d1a ("thermal: mediatek: fix register index error")
>>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>>
>> Daniel, Zhang, Amit: can you take this as a bugfix for v5.8 please? We
>> waited long enough to get a proper fix for the driver, but nothing was
>> posted on the mailinglist. Also we don't know if this will break
>> mt2701 or not, we prefer to have a working mt8173 as this is actually
>> a SoC that is available to the general public (as a chromebook product).
>>
>> I propose to take this revert for now and hope that MediaTek will fix
>> the driver for good in the near future.
>>
>
> Frank tested the patch, with the only board that is affected and
> available (apart from the mt8183 SoC), the BananaPi R2 (mt7623). The
> revert does not break the driver. Even more interesting, with and
> without the revert the thermal sensor returns always zero, so it seems
> it never actually worked.
>
> So I think we are more then good, to go ahead with reverting the patch.
Ok, I'll take care of it as a fix for 5.8.
Thanks!
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists