[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6d4c015-b70f-40e3-2275-89d245e817e8@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 06:34:12 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <p.yadav@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
CC: <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>,
<Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<michal.simek@...inx.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/17] mtd: spi-nor: add xSPI Octal DTR support
Hi, Mark,
On 6/23/20 9:30 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Pratyush Yadav (17):
> spi: spi-mem: allow specifying whether an op is DTR or not
> spi: spi-mem: allow specifying a command's extension
> spi: atmel-quadspi: reject DTR ops
> spi: spi-mtk-nor: reject DTR ops
These four patches are looking good, I had just few minor comments.
If you too think that they are ok, would you take them through the
SPI tree? If so, I would need an immutable tag on top of v5.8-rc1
preferably, so I can merge them back to SPI NOR and continue the
development on top of them.
Let us know if you want us to resubmit for those minor comments.
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists