linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 00/17] mtd: spi-nor: add xSPI Octal DTR support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 06:34:12 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <p.yadav@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
        <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
CC:     <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <michal.simek@...inx.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/17] mtd: spi-nor: add xSPI Octal DTR support

Hi, Mark,

On 6/23/20 9:30 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Pratyush Yadav (17):
>   spi: spi-mem: allow specifying whether an op is DTR or not
>   spi: spi-mem: allow specifying a command's extension
>   spi: atmel-quadspi: reject DTR ops
>   spi: spi-mtk-nor: reject DTR ops

These four patches are looking good, I had just few minor comments.
If you too think that they are ok, would you take them through the
SPI tree? If so, I would need an immutable tag on top of v5.8-rc1
preferably, so I can merge them back to SPI NOR and continue the
development on top of them.

Let us know if you want us to resubmit for those minor comments.

Cheers,
ta