linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <65b3b5bb56d2be8e365aae2163227aac7a71e600.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:23:52 +0200
From:   Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To:     daejun7.park@...sung.com, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@...sung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        Adel Choi <adel.choi@...sung.com>,
        BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 10:27 +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> Hi Bart,
> 
> > > Bart - how do you want to proceed?
> > 
> > Hi Avri and Daejun,
> > 
> > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags
> > yet. I
> > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from
> > one or
> > more reviewers who are not colleagues of the author of this patch
> > series.
> > 
> > Note: recently I have been more busy than usual, hence the delayed
> > reply.
> 
> Thank you for replying to the email even though you are busy.
> 
> Arvi, Bean - if patches looks ok, can this series have your reviewed-
> by tag?
> 
> Thanks,
> Daejun

Hi Daejun


I only can give my tested-by tag since I preliminary tested it and it
works. However, as I said in the previous email, there is performance
downgrade comparing to the direct submission approach, also, we should
think about HPB 2.0.

Anyway, if Avri wants firstly make this series patch mainlined,
performance fixup later, this is fine to me. I can add and fix it
later.

BTW, you should rebase your this series set patch since there are
conflicts with latest Martin' git repo, after that, you can add my
tested-by tag.


Tested-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>


Thanks,
Bean