linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <231786897.01594636081523.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:25:20 +0900
From:   Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
CC:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@...sung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        Adel Choi <adel.choi@...sung.com>,
        BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

Hi Bean
> > Hi Bart,
> > 
> > > > Bart - how do you want to proceed?
> > > 
> > > Hi Avri and Daejun,
> > > 
> > > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags
> > > yet. I
> > > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from
> > > one or
> > > more reviewers who are not colleagues of the author of this patch
> > > series.
> > > 
> > > Note: recently I have been more busy than usual, hence the delayed
> > > reply.
> > 
> > Thank you for replying to the email even though you are busy.
> > 
> > Arvi, Bean - if patches looks ok, can this series have your reviewed-
> > by tag?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Daejun
> 
> Hi Daejun
> 
> 
> I only can give my tested-by tag since I preliminary tested it and it
> works. However, as I said in the previous email, there is performance
> downgrade comparing to the direct submission approach, also, we should
> think about HPB 2.0.

I plan to add your direct submission approach with HPB 2.0.

> Anyway, if Avri wants firstly make this series patch mainlined,
> performance fixup later, this is fine to me. I can add and fix it
> later.
> 
> BTW, you should rebase your this series set patch since there are
> conflicts with latest Martin' git repo, after that, you can add my
> tested-by tag.
> 
OK, I will. Thanks!

> Tested-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Bean
> 

Thanks,
Daejun