linux-kernel - Re: decruft the early init / initrd / initramfs code v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:34:45 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: decruft the early init / initrd / initramfs code v2

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:06 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> this series starts to move the early init code away from requiring
> KERNEL_DS to be implicitly set during early startup.  It does so by
> first removing legacy unused cruft, and the switches away the code
> from struct file based APIs to our more usual in-kernel APIs.

Looks good to me, with the added note on the utimes cruft too as a
further cleanup (separate patch).

So you can add my acked-by.

I _would_ like the md parts to get a few more acks. I see the one from
Song Liu, anybody else in md land willing to go through those patches?
They were the bulk of it, and the least obvious to me because I don't
know that code at all?

              Linus