[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200715062711.GA21447@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 08:27:11 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/23] initramfs: switch initramfs unpacking to struct
file based APIs
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:31:01PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> That "vcollected" is ugly and broken, and seems oh-so-wrong.
>
> Because it's only use is:
>
>
> > - ksys_close(wfd);
> > + fput(wfile);
> > do_utime(vcollected, mtime);
> > kfree(vcollected);
>
> which should just have done the exact same thing that you did with
> vfs_chown() and friends: we already have a "utimes_common()" that
> takes a path, and it could have been made into "vfs_utimes()", and
> then this whole vcollected confusion would go away and be replaced by
>
> vfs_truncate(&wfile->f_path, mtime);
>
> (ok, with all the "timespec64 t[2]" things going on that do_utime()
> does now, but you get the idea).
>
> Talk about de-crufting that initramfs unpacking..
>
> But I don't hate this patch, I'm just pointing out that there's room
> for improvement.
I'll send another series to clean this up. I had a few utimes related
patch in a later series and this fits in pretty well with those.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists