[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200714205401.GE1064009@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:54:01 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc: Victor Hsieh <victorhsieh@...gle.com>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/9p: Fix TCREATE's fid in protocol
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:12:49PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>
> > Fixes: 5643135a2846 ("fs/9p: This patch implements TLCREATE for 9p2000.L protocol.")
> > Signed-off-by: Victor Hsieh <victorhsieh@...gle.com>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> (afaiu it is normally frowned upon for developers to add this cc (I can
> understand stable@ not wanting spam discussing issues left and right
> before maintainers agreed on them!) ; I can add it to the commit itself
> if requested but they normally pick most such fixes pretty nicely for
> backport anyway; I see most 9p patches backported as long as the patch
> applies cleanly which is pretty much all the time.
> Please let me know if I understood that incorrectly)
>
Some people assume this, but the stable maintainers themselves say that Cc'ing
stable@...r.kernel.org on in-development patches is fine:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200423184219.GA80650@kroah.com
And doing so is pretty much inevitable, since the tag gets picked up by
'git send-email'. (Yes, there's also "stable@...nel.org", but it's not actually
what is documented.)
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists