linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/9p: Fix TCREATE's fid in protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFCauYPo_3ztwbbexEJvdfDFCZgiake1L32cTc_Y_p4bDLr7zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:10:11 -0700
From:   Victor Hsieh <victorhsieh@...gle.com>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/9p: Fix TCREATE's fid in protocol

Please disregard this patch.  I misunderstood the protocol and have
found the actual problem in the hypervisor's 9P implementation.  Sorry
about the noise.

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 1:54 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:12:49PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> >
> > > Fixes: 5643135a2846 ("fs/9p: This patch implements TLCREATE for 9p2000.L protocol.")
> > > Signed-off-by: Victor Hsieh <victorhsieh@...gle.com>
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > (afaiu it is normally frowned upon for developers to add this cc (I can
> > understand stable@ not wanting spam discussing issues left and right
> > before maintainers agreed on them!) ; I can add it to the commit itself
> > if requested but they normally pick most such fixes pretty nicely for
> > backport anyway; I see most 9p patches backported as long as the patch
> > applies cleanly which is pretty much all the time.
> > Please let me know if I understood that incorrectly)
> >
>
> Some people assume this, but the stable maintainers themselves say that Cc'ing
> stable@...r.kernel.org on in-development patches is fine:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200423184219.GA80650@kroah.com
>
> And doing so is pretty much inevitable, since the tag gets picked up by
> 'git send-email'.  (Yes, there's also "stable@...nel.org", but it's not actually
> what is documented.)
>
> - Eric