linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 1/5] perf/pmu-events/jevents: Add enum to store aggregation like PerPkg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38d2fd54-41aa-61b0-c396-c58fc1da70da@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:39:20 +0530
From:   kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        pc@...ibm.com, namhyung@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
        maddy@...ux.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com,
        anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
        nasastry@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/5] perf/pmu-events/jevents: Add enum to store
 aggregation like PerPkg



On 7/13/20 12:25 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 05:53:10PM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>>  			}
>>  
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> index 93fe72a9dc0b..3cafbb320d68 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static bool perf_pmu_merge_alias(struct perf_pmu_alias *newalias,
>>  static int __perf_pmu__new_alias(struct list_head *list, char *dir, char *name,
>>  				 char *desc, char *val,
>>  				 char *long_desc, char *topic,
>> -				 char *unit, char *perpkg,
>> +				 char *unit, char *aggr_mode,
>>  				 char *metric_expr,
>>  				 char *metric_name,
>>  				 char *deprecated)
>> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int __perf_pmu__new_alias(struct list_head *list, char *dir, char *name,
>>  			return -1;
>>  		snprintf(alias->unit, sizeof(alias->unit), "%s", unit);
>>  	}
>> -	alias->per_pkg = perpkg && sscanf(perpkg, "%d", &num) == 1 && num == 1;
>> +	alias->per_pkg = aggr_mode && sscanf(aggr_mode, "%d", &num) == 1 && num == 1;
> 
> should you rather use 'num == PerPkg' instead 'num == 1' ?

Hi Jiri,
     Thanks for reviewing the patchset. Sure I will update it.

Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> 
> jirka
>