linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 0/5] tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200712185746.GD147742@krava>
Date:   Sun, 12 Jul 2020 20:57:46 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        pc@...ibm.com, namhyung@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
        maddy@...ux.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com,
        anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
        nasastry@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/5] tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c

On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 05:53:09PM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote:
> Patchset enhance current runtime parameter support. It introduces new
> fields like "PerChip" and "PerCore" similar to the field "PerPkg" which is
> used to specify perpkg events. 
> 
> The "PerCore" and "PerChip" specifies whether its core or chip events.
> Based on which we can decide which runtime parameter user want to
> access. Now character  '?' can refers different parameter based on user
> requirement.
> 
> Initially, every time we want to add new terms like chip, core, thread
> etc, we need to create corrsponding fields in pmu_events and event
> struct.
> This patchset adds an enum called 'aggr_mode_class' which store all these
> aggregation like perpkg/percore. It also adds new field 'AggregationMode'
> to capture these terms.
> Now, if user wants to add any new term, they just need to add it in
> the enum defined. I try to test it with  my current setup.
> 
> I also need to replace PerPkg field to AggregationMode in all the
> x86 uncore json files. It will great if Andi and team can test it
> and let me know if they have any concerns.
> 
> Changelog:
> v1 -> v2:
> - Rather then adding new field as PerCore/PerChip, created a new enum
>   to get these fields. And new field as "AggregationMode" which can
>   be used to capture these fields from json file.

few nits, but generaly looks good to me

Andi,
are you ok with this change? not sure how bad is the
PerPkg -> AggregationMode json change for you

jirka