lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:42:09 +0530 From: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org> To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> Cc: adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] mmc: sdhci-msm: Set IO pins in low power state during suspend On 7/13/2020 9:26 PM, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti wrote: > > On 7/11/2020 5:49 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:28:36PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti >> wrote: >>> Hi Mathias, >>> >>> On 7/10/2020 6:22 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:41:20PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti >>>> wrote: >>>>> Configure SDHC IO pins with low power configuration when the driver >>>>> is in suspend state. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c >>>>> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c >>>>> index 392d41d57a6e..efd2bae1430c 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c >>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ >>>>> #include <linux/iopoll.h> >>>>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> >>>>> #include <linux/interconnect.h> >>>>> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> >>>>> #include "sdhci-pltfm.h" >>>>> #include "cqhci.h" >>>>> @@ -1352,6 +1353,19 @@ static void >>>>> sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host, >>>>> sdhci_msm_hs400(host, &mmc->ios); >>>>> } >>>>> +static int sdhci_msm_set_pincfg(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host, >>>>> bool level) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = msm_host->pdev; >>>>> + int ret; >>>>> + >>>>> + if (level) >>>>> + ret = pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(&pdev->dev); >>>>> + else >>>>> + ret = pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(&pdev->dev); >>>>> + >>>>> + return ret; >>>>> +} >>>>> + >>>>> static int sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(struct mmc_host *mmc) >>>>> { >>>>> if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) >>>>> @@ -1596,6 +1610,9 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct >>>>> sdhci_host *host, int irq) >>>>> ret = sdhci_msm_set_vqmmc(msm_host, mmc, >>>>> pwr_state & REQ_BUS_ON); >>>>> if (!ret) >>>>> + ret = sdhci_msm_set_pincfg(msm_host, >>>>> + pwr_state & REQ_BUS_ON); >>>>> + if (!ret) >>>>> irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; >>>>> else >>>>> irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL; >>>> I happened to have a debug patch in my tree which logs when regulators >>>> are enabled/disabled, with this patch I see the SD card regulator >>>> toggling constantly after returning from the first system suspend. >>>> >>>> I added more logs: >>>> >>>> [ 1156.085819] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0) >>>> [ 1156.248936] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 1 (ret: 0) >>>> [ 1156.301989] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0) >>>> [ 1156.462383] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 1 (ret: 0) >>>> [ 1156.525988] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0) >>>> [ 1156.670372] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 1 (ret: 0) >>>> [ 1156.717935] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0) >>>> [ 1156.878122] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 1 (ret: 0) >>>> [ 1156.928134] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0) >>>> >>>> This is on an SC7180 platform. It doesn't run an upstream kernel >>>> though, >>>> but v5.4 with plenty of upstream patches. >>> I have verified this on couple of sc7180 targets (on Chrome platform >>> with >>> Chrome kernel). >>> But didn't see any issue. Its working as expected. >> Did you test system suspend too? At least in the Chrome OS kernel >> tree system >> suspend is not supported yet in the main branch, you'd need a pile of >> 30+ >> extra patches to get it to work. This is expected to change soon >> though :) > Yes. I have verified with system suspend-resume scenario. > Sorry forgot to mention this point explicitly in last response. > > I believe all the needed patches were present on qcom internal tree. > Suspend-resume is working fine on sc7180 qcom chrome tree. > Thanks Matthias. I cloud reproduce the issue on device without SDcard. Without SDcard inserted, cd-gpio (SD card detect GPIO) is getting read as active HIGH (as if card is inserted) during system-resume, resulting SDcard probe/scan. After that its triggering interrupt again when pinctrl config is applied during SDcard power-up sequence (as part of probe/scan) which is again triggering sdcard scan. I will have to change SDcard cd-gpio sleep config to fix this issue like below: diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi index e2230f47a17d..9266d514e163 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ pinconf-sd-cd { pins = "gpio69"; - bias-disable; + bias-pull-up; drive-strength = <2>; I will check more on why its getting read as active HIGH during resume. >>> Let me know if you are observing this issue constantly on multiple >>> boards, I >>> will share you >>> a debug patch to check it further. >> I currently have only one board with the SD card slot populated, I might >> get another one next week. >> >> The toggling occurs only when no SD card is inserted. Thanks Veera
Powered by blists - more mailing lists