| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpLg0HnZ6p=x9Egv9w65hB5CtFw=gV1rpL8vbWcHYtCzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:36:12 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] mmc: sdhci-msm: Set IO pins in low power state during suspend
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 16:12, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
<vbadigan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/13/2020 9:26 PM, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti wrote:
> >
> > On 7/11/2020 5:49 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:28:36PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Mathias,
> >>>
> >>> On 7/10/2020 6:22 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 06:41:20PM +0530, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Configure SDHC IO pins with low power configuration when the driver
> >>>>> is in suspend state.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >>>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> >>>>> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> >>>>> index 392d41d57a6e..efd2bae1430c 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> >>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >>>>> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> >>>>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >>>>> #include <linux/interconnect.h>
> >>>>> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> >>>>> #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
> >>>>> #include "cqhci.h"
> >>>>> @@ -1352,6 +1353,19 @@ static void
> >>>>> sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
> >>>>> sdhci_msm_hs400(host, &mmc->ios);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> +static int sdhci_msm_set_pincfg(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host,
> >>>>> bool level)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = msm_host->pdev;
> >>>>> + int ret;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (level)
> >>>>> + ret = pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(&pdev->dev);
> >>>>> + else
> >>>>> + ret = pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(&pdev->dev);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> static int sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc))
> >>>>> @@ -1596,6 +1610,9 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct
> >>>>> sdhci_host *host, int irq)
> >>>>> ret = sdhci_msm_set_vqmmc(msm_host, mmc,
> >>>>> pwr_state & REQ_BUS_ON);
> >>>>> if (!ret)
> >>>>> + ret = sdhci_msm_set_pincfg(msm_host,
> >>>>> + pwr_state & REQ_BUS_ON);
> >>>>> + if (!ret)
> >>>>> irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS;
> >>>>> else
> >>>>> irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL;
> >>>> I happened to have a debug patch in my tree which logs when regulators
> >>>> are enabled/disabled, with this patch I see the SD card regulator
> >>>> toggling constantly after returning from the first system suspend.
> >>>>
> >>>> I added more logs:
> >>>>
> >>>> [ 1156.085819] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0)
> >>>> [ 1156.248936] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 1 (ret: 0)
> >>>> [ 1156.301989] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0)
> >>>> [ 1156.462383] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 1 (ret: 0)
> >>>> [ 1156.525988] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0)
> >>>> [ 1156.670372] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 1 (ret: 0)
> >>>> [ 1156.717935] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0)
> >>>> [ 1156.878122] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 1 (ret: 0)
> >>>> [ 1156.928134] DBG: sdhci_msm_set_pincfg: level = 0 (ret: 0)
> >>>>
> >>>> This is on an SC7180 platform. It doesn't run an upstream kernel
> >>>> though,
> >>>> but v5.4 with plenty of upstream patches.
> >>> I have verified this on couple of sc7180 targets (on Chrome platform
> >>> with
> >>> Chrome kernel).
> >>> But didn't see any issue. Its working as expected.
> >> Did you test system suspend too? At least in the Chrome OS kernel
> >> tree system
> >> suspend is not supported yet in the main branch, you'd need a pile of
> >> 30+
> >> extra patches to get it to work. This is expected to change soon
> >> though :)
> > Yes. I have verified with system suspend-resume scenario.
> > Sorry forgot to mention this point explicitly in last response.
> >
> > I believe all the needed patches were present on qcom internal tree.
> > Suspend-resume is working fine on sc7180 qcom chrome tree.
> >
> Thanks Matthias. I cloud reproduce the issue on device without SDcard.
>
> Without SDcard inserted, cd-gpio (SD card detect GPIO) is getting read
> as active HIGH
> (as if card is inserted) during system-resume, resulting SDcard probe/scan.
>
> After that its triggering interrupt again when pinctrl config is applied
> during SDcard
> power-up sequence (as part of probe/scan) which is again triggering
> sdcard scan.
>
> I will have to change SDcard cd-gpio sleep config to fix this issue like
> below:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> index e2230f47a17d..9266d514e163 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@
>
> pinconf-sd-cd {
> pins = "gpio69";
> - bias-disable;
> + bias-pull-up;
> drive-strength = <2>;
>
> I will check more on why its getting read as active HIGH during resume.
>
>
> >>> Let me know if you are observing this issue constantly on multiple
> >>> boards, I
> >>> will share you
> >>> a debug patch to check it further.
> >> I currently have only one board with the SD card slot populated, I might
> >> get another one next week.
> >>
> >> The toggling occurs only when no SD card is inserted.
>
> Thanks
>
> Veera
>
Thanks for testing and for looking into this. Perhaps I should drop
the $subject patch then?
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists