linux-kernel - Re: [Regression] "SUNRPC: Add "@len" parameter to gss_unwrap()" breaks NFS Kerberos on upstream stable 5.4.y

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:54:30 -0400
From:   Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc:     matthew.ruffell@...onical.com,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] "SUNRPC: Add "@len" parameter to gss_unwrap()"
 breaks NFS Kerberos on upstream stable 5.4.y



> On Jul 15, 2020, at 11:14 AM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jul 15, 2020, at 11:08 AM, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Jul 15, 2020, at 23:02, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 15, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Multiple users reported NFS causes NULL pointer dereference [1] on Ubuntu, due to commit "SUNRPC: Add "@len" parameter to gss_unwrap()" and commit "SUNRPC: Fix GSS privacy computation of auth->au_ralign".
>>>> 
>>>> The same issue happens on upstream stable 5.4.y branch.
>>>> The mainline kernel doesn't have this issue though.
>>>> 
>>>> Should we revert them? Or is there any missing commits need to be backported to v5.4?
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886277
>>>> 
>>>> Kai-Heng
>>> 
>>> 31c9590ae468 ("SUNRPC: Add "@len" parameter to gss_unwrap()") is a refactoring
>>> change. It shouldn't have introduced any behavior difference. But in theory,
>>> practice and theory should be the same...
>>> 
>>> Check if 0a8e7b7d0846 ("SUNRPC: Revert 241b1f419f0e ("SUNRPC: Remove xdr_buf_trim()")")
>>> is also applied to 5.4.0-40-generic.
>> 
>> Yes, it's included. The commit is part of upstream stable 5.4.
>> 
>>> 
>>> It would help to know if v5.5 stable is working for you. I haven't had any
>>> problems with it.
>> 
>> I'll ask users to test it out. 
>> Thanks for you quick reply!
> 
> Another thought: Please ask what encryption type is in use. The
> kerberos_v1 enctypes might exercise a code path I wasn't able to
> test.

OK.

v5.4.40 does not have 31c9590ae468 and friends, but the claim is this
one crashes?

And v5.4.51 has those three and 89a3c9f5b9f0, which Pierre claims fixes
the problem for him; but another commenter says v5.4.51 still crashes.

So we're getting inconsistent problem reports.

Have the testers enable memory debugging : KASAN or SLUB debugging
might provide more information. I might have some time later this week
to try reproducing on upstream stable, but no guarantees.


--
Chuck Lever