[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200715185628.7b4k3o5efp4gnbla@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:56:28 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu/tree: Drop the lock before entering to page
allocator
On 2020-07-15 20:35:37 [+0200], Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> @@ -3306,6 +3307,9 @@ kvfree_call_rcu_add_ptr_to_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp, void *ptr)
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
> return false;
>
> + preempt_disable();
> + krc_this_cpu_unlock(*krcp, *flags);
Now you enter memory allocator with disabled preemption. This isn't any
better but we don't have a warning for this yet.
What happened to the part where I asked for a spinlock_t?
> +
> /*
> * NOTE: For one argument of kvfree_rcu() we can
> * drop the lock and get the page in sleepable
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists