lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:51:27 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
        open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>, Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>, 
        <lsrao@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 6:19 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:32 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> > msmgpio irqchip is not using return value of irq_set_wake call.
> > Start using it.
> >
> > Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
> > Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
>
> Is this something that's causing regressions so I should apply it for
> fixes, or is it fine to keep this with the rest of the series for v5.9?

I would let Maulik comment more, but as far as I can tell the function
has been ignoring the return value of irq_set_irq_wake() for much
longer.  Presumably one could logically say:

Fixes: 6aced33f4974 ("pinctrl: msm: drop wake_irqs bitmap")

...though when you get past the commit that Maulik tagged you need a
backport rather than a straight cherry-pick.

That would make me believe that there is no real hurry to land the fix here.


-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ