[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb-3Tf4s5=Gxjhy62GX=HUYkLOcPKZ6JWaLTQipz-0r6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 15:18:46 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>, Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
<lsrao@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:32 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> msmgpio irqchip is not using return value of irq_set_wake call.
> Start using it.
>
> Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Is this something that's causing regressions so I should apply it for
fixes, or is it fine to keep this with the rest of the series for v5.9?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists