[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYyCNEUSOtCJMTm7t1z15oK7nH3KcTe5LreJAzZ0KtQuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:49:35 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro
Hi Syed,
sorry for taking so long. I was on vacation and a bit snowed
under by work.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:10 AM Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com> wrote:
> Since this patchset primarily affects GPIO drivers, would you like
> to pick it up through your GPIO tree?
I have applied the patches to an immutable branch and pushed
to kernelorg for testing (autobuilders will play with it I hope).
If all works fine I will merge this into my devel branch for v5.9.
It would be desirable if Andrew gave his explicit ACK on it too.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists