linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 02/12] security: add ipe lsm evaluation loop and audit system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b0c9925-d163-46a2-bbcb-74deb7446540@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:16:43 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Deven Bowers <deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com>, agk@...hat.com,
        axboe@...nel.dk, snitzer@...hat.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
        serge@...lyn.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        paul@...l-moore.com, eparis@...hat.com, jannh@...gle.com,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-audit@...hat.com
Cc:     tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        corbet@....net, sashal@...nel.org,
        jaskarankhurana@...ux.microsoft.com, mdsakib@...rosoft.com,
        nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, pasha.tatshin@...een.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 02/12] security: add ipe lsm evaluation loop and
 audit system

On 7/17/20 4:09 PM, Deven Bowers wrote:
> +config SECURITY_IPE_PERMISSIVE_SWITCH
> +	bool "Enable the ability to switch IPE to permissive mode"
> +	default y
> +	help
> +	  This option enables two ways of switching IPE to permissive mode,
> +	  a sysctl (if enabled), `ipe.enforce`, or a kernel command line
> +	  parameter, `ipe.enforce`. If either of these are set to 0, files

	                                               is set

> +	  will be subject to IPE's policy, audit messages will be logged, but
> +	  the policy will not be enforced.
> +
> +	  If unsure, answer Y.


-- 
~Randy