lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61a62404-6a44-53c3-6d17-89fa7a4c8551@broadcom.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:11:40 -0700
From:   Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: bcm-iproc: handle clk_get_rate() return



On 2020-07-17 4:04 p.m., Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:25:12AM -0700, Scott Branden wrote:
>> From: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>
>>
>> Handle clk_get_rate() returning <= 0 condition to avoid
>> possible division by zero.
> You advertise handling <= 0, but in the code only == 0 is checked. One
> of the two is wrong ...
I checked - clk_get_rate can't return negative values.
I'll update the commit message from <= to ==.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
Thanks,
  Scott

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ