[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <681a333b-e4dc-9481-715e-a65a34e10f83@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:06:51 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, kan.liang@...el.com,
"Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list
Hi,
On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
>> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset?
>>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote:
>>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and
>>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21.
>
>>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX
>>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch.
>
>>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree?
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core
>>> I tried using git am but get:
>>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
>>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@
>>> error: could not build fake ancestor
>>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ian
>>>
>>
>> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch.
>>
>> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right?
>
> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more
> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly
> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge
> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to
> rebase it like before.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
Can this event update be accepted?
Thanks
Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists