[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82271c45-4a7d-d892-eccd-ed042b86a333@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 16:01:30 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, kan.liang@...el.com,
"Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list
Hi Arnaldo,
On 7/17/2020 2:06 PM, Jin, Yao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
>>> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset?
>>>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote:
>>>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and
>>>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21.
>>
>>>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX
>>>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch.
>>
>>>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree?
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core
>>>> I tried using git am but get:
>>>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
>>>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@
>>>> error: could not build fake ancestor
>>>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>
>>> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch.
>>>
>>> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right?
>>
>> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more
>> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly
>> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge
>> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to
>> rebase it like before.
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>>
>
> Can this event update be accepted?
>
> Thanks
> Jin Yao
Can this event list update be accepted?
Thanks
Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists