[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200719143527.GA566@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 23:35:27 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] printk: store instead of processing cont parts
On (20/07/18 01:54), John Ogness wrote:
> ---
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 114 ++++-------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index fec71229169e..c4274c867771 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -495,9 +495,14 @@ static void truncate_msg(u16 *text_len, u16 *trunc_msg_len)
> *trunc_msg_len = 0;
> }
>
> +static inline u32 printk_caller_id(void)
> +{
> + return in_task() ? task_pid_nr(current) :
> + 0x80000000 + raw_smp_processor_id();
> +}
Can we merge lines that we don't want to merge?
pr_cont() -> IRQ -> pr_cont() -> NMI -> pr_cont()
|__________________________________|
different same 0x80000000 + cpu_id caller id
caller id
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists