[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg70es2rSYsHbBcWrBPsoHmbZ8vmeqTS_Kypv6zHAwQjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 11:27:39 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] printk: store instead of processing cont parts
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 7:35 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Can we merge lines that we don't want to merge?
>
> pr_cont() -> IRQ -> pr_cont() -> NMI -> pr_cont()
That pr_cont in either IRQ or NMI context would be a bug.
You can't validly have a PR_CONT without the non-cont that precedes it.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists