[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbkpwMaS3FR1F1-WU5AjwvBchwLDKDhgHAA+-sKZLRpsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:15:18 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: ricky_wu@...ltek.com
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, rui_feng@...lsil.com.cn,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, kdlnx@...h.eu,
Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: rtsx: Add support new chip rts5228 mmc: rtsx: Add
support MMC_CAP2_NO_MMC
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:03 AM <ricky_wu@...ltek.com> wrote:
> drivers/misc/cardreader/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/misc/cardreader/rts5228.c | 740 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/misc/cardreader/rts5228.h | 168 +++++++
> drivers/misc/cardreader/rtsx_pcr.c | 89 ++--
> drivers/misc/cardreader/rtsx_pcr.h | 5 +
This drivers/misc/cardreader business is a big confusion for my mind.
Is it really that fantastic that it needs to be a unique special case?
To me it looks like a drivers/mfd thing which should have separate
drivers/regulator/rts5228.c (LDOs)
drivers/clk/rts5228.c (clocks)
subdrivers.
See for example drivers/mfd/sta2x11-mfd.c thay spawns a few
devices off a PCI card.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists