linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML schemas for LPASS clocks on SC7180

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <01daee94-756d-3970-9057-849de2b76430@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 22:56:53 +0530
From:   Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc:     David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        robh@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML schemas for LPASS
 clocks on SC7180

Hi Stephen,

Thanks for the review.

On 7/21/2020 1:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:

>> +...
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h
>> index 992b67b..bdf43adc 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h
>> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@
>>   #define GCC_MSS_Q6_MEMNOC_AXI_CLK                              128
>>   #define GCC_MSS_SNOC_AXI_CLK                                   129
>>   #define GCC_SEC_CTRL_CLK_SRC                                   130
>> +#define GCC_LPASS_CFG_NOC_SWAY_CLK                             131
>>   
>>   /* GCC resets */
>>   #define GCC_QUSB2PHY_PRIM_BCR                                  0
> 
> This hunk should be in the next patch. Oh but then that patch should come
> before this one so the binding can use it. Either way, shouldn't be part
> of this patch.
> 


We had a problem with the bot complaining about the clock handles being 
used in the example.

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/1582540703-6328-4-git-send-email-tdas@codeaurora.org/

Thus I have kept the GCC bindings in the same patch.

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--