linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML schemas for LPASS clocks on SC7180

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:05:27 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        robh@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML schemas for LPASS clocks on SC7180

Quoting Taniya Das (2020-07-21 10:26:53)
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> On 7/21/2020 1:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> 
> >> +...
> >> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h
> >> index 992b67b..bdf43adc 100644
> >> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h
> >> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.h
> >> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@
> >>   #define GCC_MSS_Q6_MEMNOC_AXI_CLK                              128
> >>   #define GCC_MSS_SNOC_AXI_CLK                                   129
> >>   #define GCC_SEC_CTRL_CLK_SRC                                   130
> >> +#define GCC_LPASS_CFG_NOC_SWAY_CLK                             131
> >>   
> >>   /* GCC resets */
> >>   #define GCC_QUSB2PHY_PRIM_BCR                                  0
> > 
> > This hunk should be in the next patch. Oh but then that patch should come
> > before this one so the binding can use it. Either way, shouldn't be part
> > of this patch.
> > 
> 
> 
> We had a problem with the bot complaining about the clock handles being 
> used in the example.
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/1582540703-6328-4-git-send-email-tdas@codeaurora.org/
> 
> Thus I have kept the GCC bindings in the same patch.
> 

Ah ok. Well I'll fix it when you resend to fix the comment on patch 4.