[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200721173355.GB2461958@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:33:55 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: B K Karthik <bkkarthik@...u.pes.edu>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart.c: fix a parentheses coding
style issue
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:44:12PM +0530, B K Karthik wrote:
> add parentheses to expression to improve
> code readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: B K Karthik <bkkarthik@...u.pes.edu>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> index 0cc64279cd2d..3108f5ab57fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> @@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ static inline int lpuart_start_rx_dma(struct lpuart_port *sport)
> * Calculate length of one DMA buffer size to keep latency below
> * 10ms at any baud rate.
> */
> - sport->rx_dma_rng_buf_len = (DMA_RX_TIMEOUT * baud / bits / 1000) * 2;
> + sport->rx_dma_rng_buf_len = (((DMA_RX_TIMEOUT * baud) / bits) / 1000) * 2;
No, what is there is more readable, don't force people to try to
remember the order of operations. I totally disagree with checkpatch
here.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists