lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200721213317.GK1665100@dtor-ws>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:33:17 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
Cc:     nick@...anahar.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, erosca@...adit-jv.com,
        Andrew_Gabbasov@...tor.com, digetx@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - only read messages in
 mxt_acquire_irq() when necessary

Hi Jiada,

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:36:12PM +0900, Jiada Wang wrote:
> +static int mxt_check_retrigen(struct mxt_data *data)
> +{
> +	struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> +	int error;
> +	int val;
> +
> +	data->use_retrigen_workaround = false;
> +
> +	if (irq_get_trigger_type(data->irq) & IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW)
> +		return 0;

Do you think we could change this to:

	irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(data->irq);
	if (!irq_data) {
		... invalid IRQ
		retrun -EINVAL;
	}

	if (irqd_is_level_type(irq_data))
		return 0;

as we should not really be concerned about polarity (there could be an
inverter between the controller and AP), but rather whether it is level
or edge interrupt.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ