[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY4PR04MB375113B7D781BF2949FE5B33E7780@CY4PR04MB3751.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:25:06 +0000
From: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
"open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"open list:NVM EXPRESS DRIVER" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:SCSI CDROM DRIVER" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Ajay Joshi <Ajay.Joshi@....com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
"open list:SONY MEMORYSTICK SUBSYSTEM" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
"open list:NETWORK BLOCK DEVICE (NBD)" <nbd@...er.debian.org>,
Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
"open list:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] block: scsi: sd: use
blk_is_valid_logical_block_size
On 2020/07/21 19:55, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size instead of hardcoded list
s/hardcoded list/hardcoded checks./
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index d90fefffe31b7..f012e7397b058 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2520,10 +2520,7 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
> "assuming 512.\n");
> }
>
> - if (sector_size != 512 &&
> - sector_size != 1024 &&
> - sector_size != 2048 &&
> - sector_size != 4096) {
> + if (!blk_is_valid_logical_block_size(sector_size)) {
> sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Unsupported sector size %d.\n",
> sector_size);
> /*
>
With the commit message fixed, looks OK.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists