linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v31 03/12] leds: lp50xx: Add the LP50XX family of the RGB LED driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c774fab9-124b-da2e-6f7c-614f34322942@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:04:54 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:     <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <marek.behun@....cz>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v31 03/12] leds: lp50xx: Add the LP50XX family of the RGB
 LED driver

Pavel

On 7/21/20 4:05 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> The device has the ability to group LED output into control banks
>> so that multiple LED banks can be controlled with the same mixing and
>> brightness.  Inversely the LEDs can also be controlled independently.
> Inversely?
I will revise it.
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,784 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +// TI LP50XX LED chip family driver
>> +// Copyright (C) 2018 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
>> +
> Can we get https here and in the binding document?
>
> Please run this through checkpatch -- I believe it will have some
> comments.
OK.
>
>> +
>> +	device_for_each_child_node(priv->dev, child) {
>> +		led = &priv->leds[i];
>> +		ret = fwnode_property_count_u32(child, "reg");
>> +		if (ret < 0) {
>> +			dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
>> +					"reg property is invalid\n");
>> +			return -EINVAL;
> is handle_put(child) needed here?

It will be after I refactor the label


>> +		}
>> +		if (ret > 1) {
>> +			priv->num_of_banked_leds = ret;
>> +			if (priv->num_of_banked_leds >
>> +			    priv->chip_info->max_modules) {
>> +				dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
>> +					"reg property is invalid\n");
>> +				ret = -EINVAL;
>> +				fwnode_handle_put(child);
>> +				goto child_out;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(child,
>> +							     "reg",
>> +							     led_banks,
>> +							     ret);
> Move this to subfunction to reduce the indentation? (Or, just refactor
> it somehow).

Actually I can just put it all on the same line since the 80 character 
requirement is relaxed.


>> +			if (ret) {
>> +				dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
>> +					"reg property is missing\n");
>> +				fwnode_handle_put(child);
>> +				goto child_out;
>> +			}
> Create label that does the handle_put so you don't need to repeat it
> quite so often?
I will rework it for  all
>
>> +		fwnode_for_each_child_node(child, led_node) {
>> +			ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(led_node, "color",
>> +						       &color_id);
>> +			if (ret)
>> +				dev_err(priv->dev, "Cannot read color\n");
>> +
>> +			mc_led_info[num_colors].color_index = color_id;
> This uses undefined value.
OK needs to goto to out.
>
>> +	ret = lp50xx_reset(led);
> Does the GPIO need to be disabled before enabling it for reset?

You mean toggle the GPIO?  Yes it should be toggled I will update it.

Dan


> Best regards,
> 									Pavel
>