[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2bdd6b8ec731d180023d593b679afc66def19b4f.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:02:27 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: trix@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, denkenz@...il.com, marcel@...tmann.org
Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: remove redundant memset
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 06:46 -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>
> Reviewing use of memset in keyctrl_pkey.c
>
> keyctl_pkey_params_get prologue code to set params up
>
> memset(params, 0, sizeof(*params));
> params->encoding = "raw";
>
> keyctl_pkey_query has the same prologue
> and calls keyctl_pkey_params_get.
>
> So remove the prologue.
>
> Fixes: 00d60fd3b932 ("KEYS: Provide keyctls to drive the new key type ops for asymmetric keys [ver #2]")
At best, this is a micro optimization.
How is this appropriate for a Fixes: line?
> diff --git a/security/keys/keyctl_pkey.c b/security/keys/keyctl_pkey.c
[]
> @@ -166,8 +166,6 @@ long keyctl_pkey_query(key_serial_t id,
> struct kernel_pkey_query res;
> long ret;
>
> - memset(¶ms, 0, sizeof(params));
> -
> ret = keyctl_pkey_params_get(id, _info, ¶ms);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto error;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists