[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e36c364e-22f4-c520-04da-ca1196fec049@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:10:56 -0700
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, dhowells@...hat.com,
jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, denkenz@...il.com, marcel@...tmann.org
Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: remove redundant memset
On 7/22/20 1:02 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 06:46 -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>
>> Reviewing use of memset in keyctrl_pkey.c
>>
>> keyctl_pkey_params_get prologue code to set params up
>>
>> memset(params, 0, sizeof(*params));
>> params->encoding = "raw";
>>
>> keyctl_pkey_query has the same prologue
>> and calls keyctl_pkey_params_get.
>>
>> So remove the prologue.
>>
>> Fixes: 00d60fd3b932 ("KEYS: Provide keyctls to drive the new key type ops for asymmetric keys [ver #2]")
> At best, this is a micro optimization.
Yes
> How is this appropriate for a Fixes: line?
Removing unneeded code is not a fix?
>
>> diff --git a/security/keys/keyctl_pkey.c b/security/keys/keyctl_pkey.c
> []
>> @@ -166,8 +166,6 @@ long keyctl_pkey_query(key_serial_t id,
>> struct kernel_pkey_query res;
>> long ret;
>>
>> - memset(¶ms, 0, sizeof(params));
>> -
>> ret = keyctl_pkey_params_get(id, _info, ¶ms);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto error;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists