[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a59b37f7-db9b-02f1-98c3-3207db213e3b@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:04:06 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [char-misc-next 1/6] mei: hbm: use sizeof of variable instead of
struct type
On 7/23/20 10:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 05:59:22PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>> There is a possibility of bug when variable type has changed but
>> corresponding struct passed to the sizeof has not.
>>
>> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> This doesn't apply to my tree as I've applied Gustavo's patch. Should I
> revert that first?
>
Yep; this series doesn't take into account my patch. I'm OK with
reverting it, so we can apply this series.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists