[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200723172901.GA2840395@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:29:01 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [char-misc-next 1/6] mei: hbm: use sizeof of variable instead of
struct type
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:04:06PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>
> On 7/23/20 10:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 05:59:22PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> >> There is a possibility of bug when variable type has changed but
> >> corresponding struct passed to the sizeof has not.
> >>
> >> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> >
> > This doesn't apply to my tree as I've applied Gustavo's patch. Should I
> > revert that first?
> >
>
> Yep; this series doesn't take into account my patch. I'm OK with
> reverting it, so we can apply this series.
Ok, will do, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists