[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQK=m18hgfuRZvykQiJPk_c+z=FR6Dpg0aRVvtJn6-Ckrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:18:42 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c: In function 'unlink_inode_storage':
> >> kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c:34:32: warning: variable 'smap' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
KP,
feel free to resubmit as soon as you fix the build.
People typically ignore the patches when buildbot complains,
since they know that maintainers are not going to apply a set with
known build issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists