lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:18:42 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote: > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c: In function 'unlink_inode_storage': > >> kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c:34:32: warning: variable 'smap' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] KP, feel free to resubmit as soon as you fix the build. People typically ignore the patches when buildbot complains, since they know that maintainers are not going to apply a set with known build issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists