lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:52:02 +0200
From:   KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for
 inodes



On 23.07.20 07:18, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:22 PM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>>
> 
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>    kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c: In function 'unlink_inode_storage':
>>>> kernel/bpf/bpf_inode_storage.c:34:32: warning: variable 'smap' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> 
> KP,
> 
> feel free to resubmit as soon as you fix the build.
> People typically ignore the patches when buildbot complains,
> since they know that maintainers are not going to apply a set with
> known build issue.
> 

Got it. I need to get into the habit of building with W=1 
(at least for the files I change).

Sent a v6 with the fix.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ