linux-kernel - Re: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:LINE! (2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a6zpuzgk.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:47:07 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, luto@...nel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org, lpf.vector@...il.com,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:LINE! (2)

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
>> All a bit mysterious.  I think it's best that we revert this from
>> linux-next until we hear from Ingo.  I queued a patch - I expect
>> Stephen will see and grab it, thanks.
>
> In the end I actually did the revert (of the revert) in the merge of
> the tip tree (so that -next will bisect better if necessary).  So you
> will not need the revert in your quilt series after today.

Sigh. I have no idea why this was in tip auto-latest. I just
reintegrated that branch and the annoyance should be gone now.

Sorry for not paying attention.

Thanks,

        tglx