lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200724093528.GB23388@gaia>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:35:28 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
        Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arm64: Export __cpu_logical_map

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:13:52AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:46:18PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > On 07/24/2020 08:38 AM, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>   arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
> > >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > >> index c793276ec7ad9..3aea05fbb9998 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > >> @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ static int __init reserve_memblock_reserved_regions(void)
> > >>   arch_initcall(reserve_memblock_reserved_regions);
> > >>     u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = INVALID_HWID };
> > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_logical_map);
> 
> If modules are using cpu_logical_map(), this looks sane ot me, but I
> wonder if we should instead turn cpu_logical_map() into a C wrapper in
> smp.c, or at least mark __cpu_logical_map as __ro_after_init lest
> someone have the bright idea to fiddle with it.

I'd go for a C wrapper and also change a couple of instances where we
assign a value directly to cpu_logical_map(cpu).

-- 
Catalin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ