linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] habanalabs pull request for kernel 5.9-rc1 (resend)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFCwf10r4eqO=6B=C_iKt17XcY7oVuRDEJs5_x9Anw_5Djig6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:35:17 +0300
From:   Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] habanalabs pull request for kernel 5.9-rc1 (resend)

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:15:25PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > Hello Greg,
> >
> > (Re-sending this pull request)
> >
> > This is habanalabs pull request for the merge window of kernel 5.9. It
> > contains many small improvements to common and GAUDI code. Details are in
> > the tag.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Oded
> >
> > The following changes since commit 7a4462a96777b64b22412f782de226c90290bf75:
> >
> >   misc: rtsx: Use standard PCI definitions (2020-07-22 13:39:31 +0200)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   git://people.freedesktop.org/~gabbayo/linux tags/misc-habanalabs-next-2020-07-23
>
> {sigh}
>
> Commit: 961a7325e670 ("habanalabs: Fix memory leak in error flow of context init")
>         Fixes tag: Fixes: 786c94810698 ("habanalabs: Use pending cs amount per asic")
>         Has these problem(s):
>                 - Subject does not match target commit subject
>                   Just use
>                                 git log -1 --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")'
>
> The scripts I use to check this are here:
>         https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_fixes.sh
>         https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_signedoff.sh
>
> And note, if I ignore these errors, you will just get the same response
> from Stephen when it hits linux-next :(
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

I'm sorry for all the trouble Greg, but I wanted to ask before I send
it again, won't the fixed sha-id be wrong once you merge this pull
request to your tree ?
Because this patch fixes a previous patch in this pull-request.
Maybe I should just squash them ?

Thanks,
Oded