linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] habanalabs pull request for kernel 5.9-rc1 (resend)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:23:23 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
Cc:     "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] habanalabs pull request for kernel 5.9-rc1 (resend)

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:35:17PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:15:25PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > Hello Greg,
> > >
> > > (Re-sending this pull request)
> > >
> > > This is habanalabs pull request for the merge window of kernel 5.9. It
> > > contains many small improvements to common and GAUDI code. Details are in
> > > the tag.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Oded
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit 7a4462a96777b64b22412f782de226c90290bf75:
> > >
> > >   misc: rtsx: Use standard PCI definitions (2020-07-22 13:39:31 +0200)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > >   git://people.freedesktop.org/~gabbayo/linux tags/misc-habanalabs-next-2020-07-23
> >
> > {sigh}
> >
> > Commit: 961a7325e670 ("habanalabs: Fix memory leak in error flow of context init")
> >         Fixes tag: Fixes: 786c94810698 ("habanalabs: Use pending cs amount per asic")
> >         Has these problem(s):
> >                 - Subject does not match target commit subject
> >                   Just use
> >                                 git log -1 --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")'
> >
> > The scripts I use to check this are here:
> >         https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_fixes.sh
> >         https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_signedoff.sh
> >
> > And note, if I ignore these errors, you will just get the same response
> > from Stephen when it hits linux-next :(
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> I'm sorry for all the trouble Greg, but I wanted to ask before I send
> it again, won't the fixed sha-id be wrong once you merge this pull
> request to your tree ?

Nope, that's because I am using git to merge it.

> Because this patch fixes a previous patch in this pull-request.
> Maybe I should just squash them ?

That's up to you.  If it was a different author, perhaps keep them
separate, it's your call.

thanks,

greg k-h