[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <159559697172.1657499.14368228495374762010.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:25:12 +1000 (AEST)
From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Will Deacon <willdeacon@...gle.com>
Cc: npiggin@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
jniethe5@...il.com, msuchanek@...e.de, paulus@...ba.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: Fix an out of date comment about MMIO ordering
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:38:20 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> This primitive has been renamed, but because it was spelled incorrectly in the
> first place it must have escaped the fixup patch. As far as I can tell this
> logic is still correct: smp_mb__after_spinlock() uses the default smp_mb()
> implementation, which is "sync" rather than "hwsync" but those are the same
> (though I'm not that familiar with PowerPC).
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] powerpc/64: Fix an out of date comment about MMIO ordering
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/147c13413c04bc6a2bd76f2503402905e5e98cff
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists