linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: Fix an out of date comment about MMIO ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:25:12 +1000 (AEST)
From:   Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Will Deacon <willdeacon@...gle.com>
Cc:     npiggin@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        jniethe5@...il.com, msuchanek@...e.de, paulus@...ba.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: Fix an out of date comment about MMIO ordering

On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:38:20 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> This primitive has been renamed, but because it was spelled incorrectly in the
> first place it must have escaped the fixup patch.  As far as I can tell this
> logic is still correct: smp_mb__after_spinlock() uses the default smp_mb()
> implementation, which is "sync" rather than "hwsync" but those are the same
> (though I'm not that familiar with PowerPC).

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/1] powerpc/64: Fix an out of date comment about MMIO ordering
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/147c13413c04bc6a2bd76f2503402905e5e98cff

cheers