linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Initial MStar/Sigmastar ARMv7 SoC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2xQmba=ikPjRZCu+PhMGMRKDWW=WbgzjRypD9U43WHDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:37:03 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Initial MStar/Sigmastar ARMv7 SoC support

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:46 AM Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com> wrote:
>
> This patch set adds initial support for MStar/Sigmastar's
> Armv7 based SoCs. There is just enough here to get to a shell
> with an initramfs but support for a lot of the hardware is
> in progress and will follow.
>
> MStar also shipped chips with MIPS cores and ARM9 etc which
> are incompatible so I've tried to make the distinction in the
> code that this is strictly for the Armv7 based chips.
>
> Sorry for the spamming this. I just really want to make some
> progress on this because I'm worried the other bits that are
> needed for these SoCs (Really old AT91 support in macb and
> the fotg210 usb host) will be lost or stop working in the meantime.
> This already happened in u-boot.

Hi Daniel,

I just found the series again after looking through some backlog,
and noticing I missed your submission from July 10. This looks
all good to me now, so I've merged the series into the arm/newsoc
branch that already contains added support for the keembay and
sparx5 SoCs.

If you require any changes to this, please send incremental
patches against the soc tree, and submit it to soc@...nel.org
so it makes it gets into patchwork.

       Arnd