linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Initial MStar/Sigmastar ARMv7 SoC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFr9PX=jMd1hogK9_JPU4N+QsDgiFyMMqON0_7-SytX2Kuh6Pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jul 2020 13:44:13 +0900
From:   Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Initial MStar/Sigmastar ARMv7 SoC support

Hi Arnd,

Thanks.

There is one small fix for the v5 set. One of the DTS file names got
broken when I rebased on a different machine.
I'll send a patch for that later today.

Cheer,

Daniel

On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 23:37, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:46 AM Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch set adds initial support for MStar/Sigmastar's
> > Armv7 based SoCs. There is just enough here to get to a shell
> > with an initramfs but support for a lot of the hardware is
> > in progress and will follow.
> >
> > MStar also shipped chips with MIPS cores and ARM9 etc which
> > are incompatible so I've tried to make the distinction in the
> > code that this is strictly for the Armv7 based chips.
> >
> > Sorry for the spamming this. I just really want to make some
> > progress on this because I'm worried the other bits that are
> > needed for these SoCs (Really old AT91 support in macb and
> > the fotg210 usb host) will be lost or stop working in the meantime.
> > This already happened in u-boot.
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I just found the series again after looking through some backlog,
> and noticing I missed your submission from July 10. This looks
> all good to me now, so I've merged the series into the arm/newsoc
> branch that already contains added support for the keembay and
> sparx5 SoCs.
>
> If you require any changes to this, please send incremental
> patches against the soc tree, and submit it to soc@...nel.org
> so it makes it gets into patchwork.
>
>        Arnd