linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix variable assignments in hv_ringbuffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BL0PR2101MB0930440E86045F954B6118B2CA750@BL0PR2101MB0930.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jul 2020 23:53:10 +0000
From:   Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To:     Andres Beltran <lkmlabelt@...il.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC:     KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        Saruhan Karademir <skarade@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix variable assignments in
 hv_ringbuffer_read()



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andres Beltran <lkmlabelt@...il.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 7:04 PM
> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>;
> Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>; linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>; Andrea
> Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>; Saruhan Karademir
> <skarade@...rosoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix variable assignments in
> hv_ringbuffer_read()
> 
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:10 PM Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
> > What is the rationale for this change, it may break other code.
> >
> > A common API model in Windows world where this originated
> > is to have a call where caller first
> > makes request and then if the requested buffer is not big enough the
> > caller look at the actual length and allocate a bigger buffer.
> >
> > Did you audit all the users of this API to make sure they aren't doing that.
> >
> 
> The rationale for the change was to solve instances like the one
> @Haiyang Zhang pointed out, especially in hv_utils, which needs
> additional hardening. Unfortunately, there is an instance in
> hv_pci_onchannelcallback() that does what you just described. Thus,
> the fix will have to be made to all the callers of vmbus_recvpacket()
> and vmbus_recvpacket_raw() to make sure they check the return value,
> which most callers are not doing now. Thanks for pointing out this
> behavior. I was not aware that the length can be checked by callers to
> allocate a bigger buffer.

To prevent future coding error, please add code comments for 
hv_ringbuffer_read() to indicate that the buffer_actual_len may be 
nonzero when the function fails, and should not be used to 
determine if the function succeeds or not.

Thanks,
- Haiyang