[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200727161739.GA60250@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:17:39 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...vell.com>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qed: fix assignment of n_rq_elems to incorrect params
field
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:17:12PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently n_rq_elems is being assigned to params.elem_size instead of the
> field params.num_elems. Coverity is detecting this as a double assingment
> to params.elem_size and reporting this as an usused value on the first
> assignment. Fix this.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Fixes: b6db3f71c976 ("qed: simplify chain allocation with init params struct")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/verbs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
DaveM will need to take this since the Fixed patch is in his tree,
thanks.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists