[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f02332767323fc3ecccea13dd47ecfff12526112.camel@ettle.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 20:52:25 +0100
From: James Ettle <james@...le.org.uk>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: 吳昊澄 Ricky
<ricky_wu@...ltek.com>, Rui Feng <rui_feng@...lsil.com.cn>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jacopo De Simoi <wilderkde@...il.com>
Subject: Re: rtsx_pci not restoring ASPM state after suspend/resume
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 09:14 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I don't know the connection between ASPM and package C-states, so I
> need to simplify this even more. All I want to do right now is
> verify
> that if we don't have any outside influences on the ASPM
> configuration
> (eg, no manual changes and no udev rules), it stays the same across
> suspend/resume.
Basically this started from me observing deep package C-states weren't
being used, until I went and fiddled with the ASPM state of the
rtsx_pci card reader under sysfs -- so phenomenological poking on my
part.
> So let's read the ASPM state directly from the
> hardware like this:
>
> sudo lspci -vvs 00:1d.0 | egrep "^0|Lnk|L1|LTR|snoop"
> sudo lspci -vvs 01:00 | egrep "^0|Lnk|L1|LTR|snoop"
>
> Can you try that before and after suspend/resume?
I've attached these to the bugzilla entry at:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208117
Spoiler: With no udev rules or suspend hooks, things are the same
before and after suspend/resume. One thing I do see (both before and
after) is that ASPM L0s and L1 is enabled for the card reader, but
disabled for the ethernet chip (does r8169 fiddle with ASPM too?).
[Oddly when I set ASPM (e.g. using udev) the lspci tools show ASPM
enabled after a suspend/resume, but still no deep package C-states
until I manually fiddle via sysfs on the card reader. Sorry if this
only muddies the water further!]
Thanks,
-James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists