linux-kernel - Re: checkpatch: support deprecated terms checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200727134411.73461df2fe73f8f96d93f75e@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:44:11 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
Cc:     Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <apw@...onical.com>, <colin.king@...onical.com>, <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        <pavel@....cz>, SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: checkpatch: support deprecated terms checking

On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:54:41 +0200 SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com> wrote:

> > > > Unfortunately, the inexperienced _do_ in fact run
> > > > checkpatch on files and submit inappropriate patches.

I don't think I really agree with the "new code only" guideline (where
did this come from, anyway?).  10 years from now any remaining pre-2020
terms will look exceedingly archaic and will get converted at some
point.

Wouldn't be longterm realistic to just bite the bullet now and add these
conversions to the various todo lists?