linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period with u64 data length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200727075243.cjkxblsivgnn6jsk@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:52:43 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Martin Botka <martin.botka1@...il.com>
Cc:     Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@...eaurora.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period
 with u64 data length

Hello Martin,

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:29:19AM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:12:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
> >> > Note there is already a series that changes these values to u64. See
> >> > a9d887dc1c60ed67f2271d66560cdcf864c4a578 in linux-next.
> >>
> >> Amazing. But isn't there the same issue with it as this one where this
> >> would fail to build on 32 bit architecture?
> >
> > In theory all these cases are coped for. I didn't see any problems yet,
> > so I still assume also the 32 bit archs are fine.
> 
> OK then all is fine. I will drop the patch in V2.
> 
> Also Uwe i just realized that you sent the original message and also
> this reply only to me and not to anyone else.
> Could you please send the messages also to everyone else ?

I hit "reply-to-all" and the mail only was sent to you because you wrote
to only me.

Also threading is somehow strange because your reply to my mail (with

	Message-Id: 20200727070411.ovkuwm76vuw3heo7@...gutronix.de

) has

	In-Reply-To: <CADQ2G_HkiAZx8OhfQ_jeizveMaB-QN9dfN6Tcwfk9XuF97rmOg@...l.gmail.com>

. So I assume all the strange things happened on your side until proved
otherwise. :-)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)