linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period with u64 data length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:58:01 +0200
From:   Martin Botka <martin.botka1@...il.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@...eaurora.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period
 with u64 data length

Hello,

> I hit "reply-to-all" and the mail only was sent to you because you wrote
> to only me.

Yes my reply was only to you. But your original message was sent only to me too.
So when i clicked reply to all it was only you as you sent it only to me.

> Also threading is somehow strange because your reply to my mail

Yes Gmail would not allow me to reply to your message and also send it
to everyone so i had to reply to Andy's email which is why the
threading is broken there. Sorry for that.

> So I assume all the strange things happened on your side until proved
> otherwise. :-)

I think i just proved otherwise :)

Best Regards,
Martin